7 Jan 2017

Evil imitates art?

Found on the facebook site DeadState who found it via someone else etc...

As I recall the photo description from elsewhere this is US Republicans laughing about their plans to repeal the Affordable Health Care act without which thousands of their countrymen will die of entirely preventable causes:

6 Jan 2017

Surfing the internet because it's bloody hot outside

"Last year was the hottest year on record by a wide margin, with temperatures creeping close to a ceiling set by almost 200 nations for limiting global warming, the European Union's Copernicus Climate Change Service has said.
The data are the first of the New Year to confirm many projections that 2016 will exceed 2015 as the warmest since reliable records began in the 19th century, the Copernicus organisation said in a report."

Nothing to see here... move along... keep using dirty energy sources it makes someone rich...

"Hottest year on record recorded in Sydney."

Yes, yes, alright... They have air-con there don't they? Only a small part of the country.

Just scientists and people who hate Jesus wanting to make money, somehow.... Pay no attention.

And not necessarily connected, just unusual, from the middle of the desert:

"Alice Springs police officers swim through flood waters to rescue two stranded tourists"

Australian cops... don't have time to shoot kids with toy guns.

oh pretty...! waterfalls off Uluru. Happens once in... well, practically never... but it has happened before:

Still the most beautiful country.

So say us all:

13 Jul 2016

The Murdoch press shifts gears

As noted by The Guardian:

Rupert Murdoch, February 2003:

“We can’t back down now, where you hand over the whole of the Middle East to Saddam...I think Bush is acting very morally, very correctly, and I think he is going to go on with it... I think Tony (Blair) is being extraordinarily courageous and strong”.

The Murdoch UK press now:

“Tony Blair’s deception, negligence and naivety condemned 179 of our (British) troops — and countless Iraqis — to their deaths... Saddam Hussein’s gangster state was certainly appalling. But it posed no imminent threat to us. Bush and Blair’s assumption that they could cleanly cut the head off the snake and effortlessly transform Iraq into a peaceful liberal democracy was insane"

I knew it was insane in 2003. A lot of people did. But your oily business sold it to people who don't pay as much attention... and now there is Islamic State, and all the death from that brand around the world .

And you've changed your mind and think Trump is just terrific now?

When will you just go away Rupert? Just go away. This world is a bit too serious, and way too deadly, for the fickle whims of vile old bullies to inform undiscerning public opinion.

17 Jun 2016

The murder of Jo Cox

What makes an ‘assassination’ rather than a killing in the general sense? When it is done as part of a broader continuous intent. And by that definition Jo Cox was assassinated.

No don’t talk to me about ‘crazy’ or ‘lone wolf’... That's just a tolerance for murder.
That's just cowardice and lack of willingness to take responsibility and pin accountability on the guilty. Even if you believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone for some vague political motive – and there is a mountain of doubt about that – it was still an ‘assassination’.

Jo Cox - the person - may not have been the complete target, but democracy as embodied by her being a professional politician surely was.
The commitment that we have to one another to run a decent society was what was being spurned.

“The man arrested over the killing of the MP Jo Cox bought books from a US-based neo-Nazi group, including guides on how to build homemade guns and explosives, according an anti-hate campaign group in the US. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) published receipts that appeared to show Thomas Mair bought, among other books, a manual on how to make a homemade pistol from the National Alliance. The receipts, some of which date back to the 1990s, showed Mair spent more than $620 (£436) on literature from the group, which advocates the creation of an all-white homeland and the eradication of Jewish people.”

Any wiggle room there?
He was a radicalised Right winger. It doesn’t matter if he was mentally incompetent. He was used. Like a hacked credit card number is used by a criminal. Western fascism operates on the same principle as ISIS brand extremism... propagation of material intended to incite violence. Less random than an improvised explosive, it only explodes against specific targets.

This is where I want emphasize a point that gets deflected and diluted by moral confusion about what freedom of speech actually means.
It DOESN’T, in fact, mean that you can say ANYTHING you want, and stamp your foot afterwards like some petulant child that it is your right over any other right or consideration.
In point of fact we’ve never been able to say any ugly thing we want - we have laws about libel. We have laws about false advertising. And sometimes we have laws about hate speech.

We have them for a reason. Because genuine freedom comes with a measure of responsibility, and the condition that you WILL be accountable for your deeds and words.
That's what being a fucking adult means, people.

To quote Alex Massie in The Spectator today:

“Sometimes rhetoric has consequences. If you spend days, weeks, months, years telling people they are under threat, that their country has been stolen from them, that they have been betrayed and sold down the river, that their birthright has been pilfered, that their problem is they’re too slow to realise any of this is happening, that their problem is they’re not sufficiently mad as hell, then at some point, in some place, something or someone is going to snap. And then something terrible is going to happen.”

Genuine freedom means you aren’t free to crush the reasonable freedoms of others. And if we spend all our efforts defending the expression of hate, then you can kiss justice goodbye.

No these laws don't necessarily stop the hate speech. THAT'S NOT THE PURPOSE.
The purpose is to offer legal recourse to the victims and render punishment to the perpetrator.
Just like any other law.

Anyway the rhetoric did have consequences. Can’t ask Jo Cox about it anymore. Maybe you can ask Giffords.

7 Jun 2016

The tobacco industry doesn't want you to smoke

No really... there is apparently some US lobbyist ad on Youtube aimed at plain packaging laws for cigarettes, addressing the experience in Australia.
Aside from featuring a reportedly preposterous fake accent (a great guide to the authenticity of the information in the ad), it claims smoking increased after the introduction of the laws and therefore said laws don't work*.

Aren't you glad the Tobacco industry is fighting these laws that let them sell more cigarettes...
and that they cheerfully spend so much money on lobbyists to actually reduce their own profits?

I personally would ask a few relatives of mine who did smoke to write here about the benefits of sticking a collection of damaging substances in your mouth and setting it on fire...
Except they're all dead.

Sorry about that.

 *after a while... you do get tired of hearing greedy twerps and lunatic wankers telling you your laws don't work when it's fucking obvious - especially when you actually live here - that they DO work, and even Australians wouldn't keep laws if they had reverse outcomes